Why Represented Employees Have Fairer Performance Evaluation Policies

By Lani Richardson, Retired UC Coordinator, Teamster and Organizer with the UC Administrative Professionals Network

One of the most important distinctions between policy-covered workers (like UC administrative professionals) and represented workers* (at least those who are Teamsters in the clerical (CX) unit that I used to belong to) is that the Teamster-represented workers not only have a guarantee to be informed if their work is not up to par, but more importantly the opportunity to make corrective measures to improve.

Although UC has policies that are supposed to give all employees the same opportunity for improvement, many of the policy-covered employees I’ve talked with have experienced (or at least know of) colleagues who can attest to the fact that these policies are not often followed. Sadly the opportunity to improve upon one’s work performance is oftentimes brought to their attention during an annual Performance Evaluation (PE), which in turn can affect their wage increases.

During PEs many policy-covered workers have been told that they “need to improve on certain duties.” In some cases, it feels like salt being poured into a wound. The reason for this is that some workers have never been given clear instructions about their actual job duties or expectations, or they were not given any notice of potential issues prior to their PE. Others have never received the necessary training to satisfactorily perform all of their expected duties and have even been denied when they have asked for specific training to help with their overall performance. 

Again, UC policies are in place that allow staff to request and receive training so they can improve themselves and advance in our careers at UC, but since approvals are based upon the “operational needs” of each department, they are not guaranteed approval nor is the impacted staff person guaranteed an explanation. This is in stark contrast to represented employees — as is the case with my former CX work group, who operates under a union contract — where, if requested, departments must state the reason why training was not provided. If the represented employees feels that s/he was improperly denied training, they may request further information to determine if workload, staffing or favoritism issues exist through their union contract. These same requests can also be made if an employee receives a poor PE.

What does all of this mean for those staff who are only covered by policy? It means that without a union contract, they have no control over pay raises, professional development or job security. It means that long-term success and career growth can end up being less about ability or work ethic and more about relationships or currying favor. It means that a worker could potentially be missing out on thousands of dollars in compensation throughout the course of a career at UC.

“Policy covered” staff work right alongside people at UC every day who don’t have this problem because opportunities to receive training and improve performance are written into their union contract. It’s about time UC administrative professional staff take advantage of protections that exist only through a collective bargaining agreement.

*IMPORTANT NOTE: “Represented” workers are covered by applicable policies AND by the rights negotiated in their labor contracts.  They have a two layers of protections.  Only a represented employee has the effective ability to collectively negotiate with UC to improve pay and other work issues and a union contract that protects these gains.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

More News

UCLA Lunch & Learn

We are BACK on Campus and would like to formally invite you to our Lunch & Learn meeting held at UCLA! We will be hosting two meetings;Tuesday November 9th & Wednesday November 10th from 11:30am-1:00pm. Please RSVP by completing the contact card below as well as attain full details in this flyer.

Read More »

Gov. Newsom secures more than $1 billion for UC and CSU

Represented or Not your UC job/income depends partly on state funding, Governor Newsom supports the UC and labor!Imagine what kind of funding the UC and CSU would have if we have a governor that is not pro-labor? No matter our political persuasion, we must protect our current and future jobs by protecting the Governor who

Read More »

Gaining Union Representation through Accretion

Did You Know You Could Start Enjoying the Benefits of a Teamster Contract Through a Process Called Accretion? What is the “Accretion Process”? When unrepresented (non-union) UC employees share the same job duties or essential functions as Union represented UC employees or perform work that has been historically performed by Union represented employees, a labor

Read More »

If You Have Had More Tasks Added; You May Be Eligible for a Stipend.

Did you know that the UC offers administrative stipends for employees performing duties outside of their regular job description?  Based on the feedback we received from many of you on our Survey on Staff Concerns, many of you are unaware of this and may be able to qualify for a stipend.  For specific information for your campus,

Read More »